Should agents take on multi-step work, or should people retain control over consequential tasks?
Delegate longer workflows
Agents should move work forward continuously, handle multi-step tasks, and prompt people when they need input.
2026, however, does seem likely to become the year of AI agents. Artificial Intelligence will evolve from passive tools (chat UI that waits for a prompt) to active Agentic Systems (software that plans, executes, and iterates on tasks autonomously).
The firm with AI tools requires their users to prompt the agents to produce work or to do work. But here, like I said at arca, agents prompt people more than people prompt agents.
Proでさらに1件の引用
Keep consequential controls
Agents can analyze and prepare work, but deterministic safeguards and human review should retain control over consequential actions and changes.
The analysis part is fully automated, but they're unable to actually execute any sort of money movement or liquidation automatically. We have a very deep integration with our custodian that actually gives us APIs to be able to do that.
Yeah, so all of our safety restrictions are fully deterministic and they take the decision making off the agent's hands.
Proでさらに2件の引用