Dieser Teil von Current Zeitgeist ist noch nicht geöffnet. Die Community schon: die Themen der Welt und die Diskussionen, in denen Menschen gemeinsam Antworten finden.
KI-generiert Fragen, Positionen und Verbindungen von einem KI-Modell aus den Zitaten und Zahlen dieser Seite benannt. Jedes Zitat wird Wort für Wort mit seiner Quelle abgeglichen; Zahlen stammen nur aus den gezeigten Umfragen. Wie diese Seiten entstehen
Künstliche Intelligenz
Medien
Künstliche Intelligenz
Meinungen
Die Fragen, über die das Feld streitet, und jede Seite in den Worten derer, die sie vertreten.
Should agents take on multi-step work, or should people retain control over consequential tasks?
Delegate longer workflows
Agents should move work forward continuously, handle multi-step tasks, and prompt people when they need input.
2026, however, does seem likely to become the year of AI agents. Artificial Intelligence will evolve from passive tools (chat UI that waits for a prompt) to active Agentic Systems (software that plans, executes, and iterates on tasks autonomously).
The firm with AI tools requires their users to prompt the agents to produce work or to do work. But here, like I said at arca, agents prompt people more than people prompt agents.
Agents can analyze and prepare work, but deterministic safeguards and human review should retain control over consequential actions and changes.
The analysis part is fully automated, but they're unable to actually execute any sort of money movement or liquidation automatically. We have a very deep integration with our custodian that actually gives us APIs to be able to do that.
And now one smart person can actually handle, like we talked about, 500 different cases of very different facts, very different situations. And how do you even keep that in your brain? Like, it's hard, right? But now you don't have to.
AI may replace work and weaken skills, while concentrating the gains among a small number of people.
Gemessen
US adultsWill AI lead to more jobs, fewer jobs, or not make much difference in the US over the next 20 years?
Fewer jobs71 %
Will not make much difference10 %
More jobs5 %
Not sure14 %
This is why I can simultaneously think that AI will disrupt 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs over 1–5 years, while also thinking we may have AI that is more capable than everyone in only 1–2 years.
I am worried about the corporate concentration of power. I am worried about a handful of people getting all of the money from this AI boom. I'm worried about the loss of jobs and the sort of outsourcing of thinking to these AI systems.
Does AI make systems more secure, or give attackers a greater advantage?
AI strengthens defense
AI could help defenders write more secure software and build stronger systems, even as it changes security work.
And so I think it is possible, I think it may not be immediate, but over time we're going to perhaps use AI to help us write more secure software or build more secure systems.
At Caliph, we think like, you know, we are enter the era of the central hackers. Basically the best hacker right now is a combination of AI and humans.
AI accelerates vulnerability discovery and exploitation, and attackers can move faster than defenders.
What AI has done is it's kind of accelerated the speed in which you identify and exploit these vulnerabilities to a level where it's almost like superhuman.
Was veröffentlichte Umfragen zählten, als sie Menschen im und um das Feld fragten.
US adultsDoes the increased use of AI in daily life make you feel more concerned than excited, more excited than concerned, or equally both?
More concerned than excited52 %
Equally concerned and excited37 %
More excited than concerned9 %
US adults ages 18-29Does the increased use of AI in daily life make you feel more concerned than excited, more excited than concerned, or equally both?
More concerned than excited55 %
More excited than concerned11 %
US adultsWill AI lead to more jobs, fewer jobs, or not make much difference in the US over the next 20 years?
Fewer jobs71 %
Will not make much difference10 %
More jobs5 %
Not sure14 %
US adults ages 18-29Think AI will lead to fewer jobs in the US over the next 20 years
Fewer jobs73 %
US adultsIs AI advancing too quickly, too slowly, or at about the right pace?
Too quickly63 %
At about the right pace19 %
Not sure16 %
Too slowly2 %
Adults in 37 countries (median across countries)Does the increased use of AI in daily life make you feel more concerned than excited, more excited than concerned, or equally both?
More concerned than excited (median)37 %
Equally concerned and excited (median)41 %
US adults (Gallup Panel)Use AI sometimes, often or always at work, at school or in their personal lives
Use AI at least sometimes51 %
US adults (Gallup Panel)How much do you trust or distrust AI's capability to make fair and unbiased decisions?
Fully or somewhat trust28 %
Fully or somewhat distrust65 %
AI experts living in the US (authors and presenters at 21 AI conferences, 2023-24)Will AI have a positive or negative impact on the US over the next 20 years?
Very or somewhat positive56 %
US adultsWill AI have a positive or negative impact on the US over the next 20 years?
Very or somewhat positive17 %
AI experts living in the US (authors and presenters at 21 AI conferences, 2023-24)Does the increased use of AI in daily life make you feel more excited than concerned, more concerned than excited, or equally both?
More excited than concerned47 %
More concerned than excited15 %
US adultsDoes the increased use of AI in daily life make you feel more excited than concerned, more concerned than excited, or equally both?
More excited than concerned11 %
More concerned than excited51 %
AI experts living in the US (authors and presenters at 21 AI conferences, 2023-24)Will AI have a positive or negative impact on how people do their jobs over the next 20 years?
Very or somewhat positive73 %
US adultsWill AI have a positive or negative impact on how people do their jobs over the next 20 years?
Very or somewhat positive23 %
Developers and technologists who answered the Stack Overflow Developer Survey (169 countries)Do you currently use AI tools or AI agents in your role at work?
AI coding assistants or coding agents65,9 %
General-purpose AI chat tools62,5 %
AI agents or automated workflows26,2 %
Internal AI tools built by my company17,8 %
I don't use AI tools17,2 %
Developers and technologists who answered the Stack Overflow Developer Survey (169 countries)How much do you trust the output from AI tools or AI agents as part of your workflow?
I trust it when I can easily verify the output48 %
I trust it for many tasks, but not important work decisions16,3 %
I trust it for low-risk work tasks only16,3 %
I do not trust it for most work tasks12,3 %
I trust it for many tasks, including important work decisions6,6 %
Not sure / I do not use AI tools0,5 %
Developers and technologists who answered the Stack Overflow Developer Survey (169 countries)How would you describe your attitude toward using AI tools or agents as part of your work?
Very favorable31,6 %
Somewhat favorable30,4 %
Neutral15,3 %
Somewhat unfavorable14,6 %
Very unfavorable6,9 %
Not sure1,2 %
Developers and technologists who answered the Stack Overflow Developer Survey (169 countries)Reasons for avoiding AI at work or school
I do not avoid using AI at work or school41,3 %
Concern over losing job skills or training an AI to replace you17,1 %
Moral or ethical concerns15,2 %
Issues with privacy or security13 %
Environmental concerns8,2 %
Other2,7 %
Difficulty or lack of training2,6 %
Digital designers who use generative AI toolsThe AI tools I use help me create better designs
Agree or strongly agree91 %
Digital designers in North America, APAC, Europe, LATAM and the Middle EastUse generative AI tools
Use generative AI tools72 %
US ad industry executives (companies with $1M+ annual media spend)Their company has deployed AI in the creative process
Have deployed AI in creative83 %
B2B and B2C marketers worldwideMarketing team uses AI in at least a few marketing areas
Use AI86,4 %
Marketing leaders at for-profit US companiesCompany uses AI for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to get content to appear in AI-generated search results
Use AI for GEO41,5 %
US employees (Gallup Panel)How often do you use AI in your role at work?
Daily15 %
A few times a week or more30 %
A few times a year or more52 %
US employeesHow likely is it that your job will be eliminated in the next five years because of technological innovations such as automation or AI?
Very or somewhat likely: all US employees18 %
Very or somewhat likely: employees where AI has been implemented23 %
Full-time knowledge workers who use AI at work, in 10 countriesShare who are Frontier Professionals (use agents for multi-step work, routinely redesign workflows, take part in shared AI practices)
Frontier Professionals16 %
US workers (employed adults, part time or full time)How do you feel about the future use of AI in the workplace?
Worried52 %
Hopeful36 %
Overwhelmed33 %
US physiciansWhich, if any, of these AI use cases do you currently incorporate into your practice?
Use at least one AI use case72 %
Unsure about available AI tools9 %
No reported AI use19 %
US physiciansOverall, would you say the potential increased use of AI in your professional life makes you feel more excited than concerned, more concerned than excited, or equally both?
More excited than concerned37 %
Equally excited and concerned40 %
US physiciansHow concerned are you that the use of AI tools will lead to loss of skills?
Very, somewhat or mildly concerned about skill loss88 %
Very or somewhat concerned about skill loss in current medical students and residents70 %
Game industry professionalsIs generative AI having a positive or negative impact on the game industry?
Negative impact52 %
Positive impact7 %
Game industry professionalsUse generative AI tools as part of their job
All respondents36 %
At game studios30 %
At publishers, support teams and marketing/PR firms58 %
Full-time UK undergraduatesUse generative AI to help with assessed work
Use generative AI for assessed work94 %
Full-time UK undergraduatesInclude AI-generated text directly in assessed work
Include AI-generated text directly12 %
Online news users in 48 markets (average across markets)Sources used to get news
Social media and video networks54 %
News organisations' own websites and apps51 %
AI chatbots10 %
US registered votersFavour stricter rules or limits on data-centre construction
Favour stricter rules or limits71 %
US registered votersFavour a moratorium halting all new data-centre construction
Favour a moratorium23 %
US registered votersAlarmed about higher electricity bills and data-centre deals cut without public input
Alarmed77 %
US parents of K-12 students (RAND survey panels)Greater use of AI will harm students' critical-thinking skills
Agree61 %
US school district leaders (RAND survey panels)Greater use of AI will harm students' critical-thinking skills
The Guardian · 284 Konten haben es geteilt · seit 2 Tagen im Trend
7 weitere mit Pro
Links: am meisten geteilt auf Mastodon-Servern, von einem KI-Modell nach Feld eingeordnet. Beiträge: eine Zufallsstichprobe von Bluesky, von einem KI-Modell eingeordnet.
Künstliche Intelligenz
Richtung
Forecasts point toward agents taking on longer, more autonomous workflows, while several speakers expect humans to guide or supervise their work.
2026, however, does seem likely to become the year of AI agents. Artificial Intelligence will evolve from passive tools (chat UI that waits for a prompt) to active Agentic Systems (software that plans, executes, and iterates on tasks autonomously).
Prognosen und Visionen, mit dem Datum, an dem sie gesagt wurden, und dem, an dem sie sich prüfen lassen.
Offen
And that is what the future looks like. It's truly moving the case forward continuously and you're helping making it do a better job than it could do by itself. That is I think the future of law.
And so we have this world, which I think is one that we're going to be in increasingly, where humans are oftentimes almost becoming rappers on AI agents and AI systems, where all we're doing is seeing the faces and typing the thought.
This feedback loop is gathering steam month by month, and may be only 1–2 years away from a point where the current generation of AI autonomously builds the next.
Verbreitete Behauptungen und was die Quellen stattdessen zeigen.
Oft gesagt
Agents are expected to operate without human oversight.
Was die Quellen zeigen
Some forecasts anticipate autonomous workflows, but practitioners describe human review, fixed safety rules, and limits on what agents can execute.
2026, however, does seem likely to become the year of AI agents. Artificial Intelligence will evolve from passive tools (chat UI that waits for a prompt) to active Agentic Systems (software that plans, executes, and iterates on tasks autonomously).
Keep money movement outside agent control, and use deterministic rules to constrain decisions.
The analysis part is fully automated, but they're unable to actually execute any sort of money movement or liquidation automatically. We have a very deep integration with our custodian that actually gives us APIs to be able to do that.
Record agent actions in change logs and require a human engineer to review prompt changes before release.
And so our system is such that auditability is by default. Every single action that an agent takes produces a change log of what changed, who changed it from which part of the system, and when.