But I don't think it replaces critical reasoning and thinking. And I think this is true for, for universities in many ways.

To have judgment, you need to have knowledge so that you can actually judge. The second part of this is the K12 piece of it.

So is the future of higher ed. The ability to discern, certify and evaluate that the learning is real versus the historical cadence of higher education is about providing the knowledge.

We just need to come up with harder problems for students to work through because, you know, AI is going to do the easy stuff.

I still have my students write two papers in my class, but this year I'm adding an oral defense component for the final paper. Not because I tell them to not use AI. I tell them to use it, but they better learn it.

We also had to restructure the project a bit, add like oral presentation component to it and bring some more interaction to make sure that essentially we're educating the human, not just testing the capabilities of Claude. Right. Those are very different things.

I think the Process is transferable. I think how an institution lands as to what is centralized, what is decentralized, can be different because every institution has strengths and weaknesses that are not identical.

So if we know that we cannot stay here and there's plenty of things that need fixing, let's burn it down and do something that matters and figure out how to use this appropriately.

We all kind of just assumed that what was tradition was regulation. We all assumed that what is doctrine, if you will, what is somehow the only way to do education?