Cette partie de Current Zeitgeist n’est pas encore ouverte. La communauté, si : les sujets du monde et les discussions où l’on trouve des réponses ensemble.
Généré par IA Questions, positions et liens nommés par un modèle d’IA à partir des citations et chiffres de cette page. Chaque citation est vérifiée mot pour mot avec sa source ; les chiffres viennent uniquement des enquêtes affichées. Comment ces pages sont faites
Services juridiques et professionnels
Médias
Services juridiques et professionnels
Opinions
Les questions dont le domaine débat, et chaque camp dans les mots de ceux qui le défendent.
How much legal work can AI replace, and what work must remain with lawyers?
Broad agent adoption
Agents could let one lawyer handle many cases and advance work continuously, changing how legal matters are managed.
And that is what the future looks like. It's truly moving the case forward continuously and you're helping making it do a better job than it could do by itself. That is I think the future of law.
And now one smart person can actually handle, like we talked about, 500 different cases of very different facts, very different situations. And how do you even keep that in your brain? Like, it's hard, right? But now you don't have to.
While the AI cult wants you to believe the technology will soon replace 100 percent of attorney hours, the reality is probably somewhere between 5 and 20.
Where outcomes are known, legal work can be priced at an amortized amount rather than only as advisory or fee-for-service work.
For a lot of it, you actually know what the outcomes are and you should be able to take your work down to an amortized amount and deliver that back. And that is what we are betting on.
Should legal AI extend services to individuals, or focus on institutions?
Services for individuals
Legal AI should make services accessible to people who cannot afford them, rather than serving only institutions and in-house legal teams.
What Eve is, is legal AI for real people. Right? Like people like you, me, not institutions, not in house legal, not the people that already have all the resources. But how do we actually provide legal services to people that otherwise can't afford it?
Legal AI should build organizational memory and make it available through the interface an institutional end user chooses.
We truly believe that what we should be doing is focusing on building context, building that organizational memory and brain and then be able to surface it and make it accessible through whatever interface an end user chooses.
20 Minutes · 44 comptes l’ont partagé · en tendance depuis 2 jours
Liens : les plus partagés sur des serveurs Mastodon, classés par un modèle d’IA. Publications : un échantillon aléatoire de Bluesky, classé par un modèle d’IA.
Services juridiques et professionnels
Objectifs et visions
Prévisions et visions, avec la date où elles ont été dites et celle où l’on pourra les vérifier.
Ouverte
And that is what the future looks like. It's truly moving the case forward continuously and you're helping making it do a better job than it could do by itself. That is I think the future of law.
What Eve is, is legal AI for real people. Right? Like people like you, me, not institutions, not in house legal, not the people that already have all the resources. But how do we actually provide legal services to people that otherwise can't afford it?
For a lot of it, you actually know what the outcomes are and you should be able to take your work down to an amortized amount and deliver that back. And that is what we are betting on.
Legal AI is aimed only at institutions and in-house teams.
Ce que montrent les sources
One stated vision instead targets individuals who otherwise cannot afford legal services.
What Eve is, is legal AI for real people. Right? Like people like you, me, not institutions, not in house legal, not the people that already have all the resources. But how do we actually provide legal services to people that otherwise can't afford it?
Ce que disent faire aujourd’hui ceux qui ont une longueur d’avance.
Build organizational memory and make it available through the interface each end user chooses.
We truly believe that what we should be doing is focusing on building context, building that organizational memory and brain and then be able to surface it and make it accessible through whatever interface an end user chooses.
Introduce a tool within a small office or practice group and let colleagues' use spread locally.
And what we find is that inside an office or a practice group, if they get two or three folks using it, pretty soon, like in the hallways, it's spreading like wildfire.